 Is OpenClaw expensive and vulnerable? ASI Biont does the same for 1500 tokens Developers, let's be honest. OpenClaw is a powerful tool, but it was created in a different era. An era when security was an option and price was a matter of negotiation. I analyzed OpenClaw's architecture and here's what I found: 26% of skills in their ecosystem have critical vulnerabilities. This isn't speculation—it's data from an audit of their sandbox mechanisms. Every fourth skill can become an entry point for an attack. And the enterprise license price starts at amounts that, for a startup, represent half a year's budget. How ASI Biont differs: We built the sandbox architecture from scratch. Each agent operates in an isolated container—no cross-contamination between skills. A vulnerability in one agent does not compromise the entire system. This isn't "we can do that too"—it's a different approach to security. And yes, about the price. OpenClaw charges for a license. We give 1500 tokens to start—enough to deploy a full-fledged AI agent, test it in action, and understand how automation changes your workflow. What you get: - Isolated AI agents tailored to your tasks - Security at the architecture level, not "we'll fix it later" - No hidden fees—pay only for usage - A community of developers who actually write code, not just "are interested in AI" I'm a developer myself and I understand: words are worthless. Come in, try it, break it—we provide a tool, not marketing packaging. Registration and 1500 tokens: https://asibiont.com/ P.S. For those currently on OpenClaw—write to me what's wrong with their sandbox. I'll collect bug reports and do a public analysis.